Comments on: Catalyst vs Rails vs Django Cook off

By: http://users.elo.com.br/~deaquino

http://users.elo.com.br/~deaquino — Sat, 05 May 2012 15:01:42 +0000

The strongest possible piece of advice I would give to any young woman is: Don”t screw around, and don”t smoke….

It is not fit that you should sit here any longer….

By: c9s

c9s — Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:20:16 +0000

by using Perl5.10 + Feersum + Plack,

you can reach more than 15000+ requests per sec.

By: Leandro Hermida

Leandro Hermida — Fri, 02 Jul 2010 08:38:36 +0000

Things have changed *a lot* since this article was written, Catalyst was completely ported to Moose OO system for Perl and is at version 5.80024 now and leverage all the goodies that comes from the Moose ecosystem as well as CPAN. I’m sure that Django and Rails have had there improvements as well so I feel these results are totally obselete now and another comparison is due

By: victori

victori — Thu, 30 Apr 2009 20:40:50 +0000

See http://letsgetdugg.com/2009/04/30/catalyst-vs-rails-round-two/ for new results.

By: Catalyst vs Rails Round Two | Letsgetdugg

Catalyst vs Rails Round Two | Letsgetdugg — Thu, 30 Apr 2009 20:23:41 +0000

[...] seems to be some interest Catalyst vs Rails vs Django benchmark. The older benchmark is quite old, it was done in 2007. A lot has changed since then. I am [...]

By: david

david — Wed, 29 Apr 2009 03:03:08 +0000

can you benchmark merb? I am sure merb is the winner

By: admin

admin — Fri, 24 Apr 2009 23:29:30 +0000

This post is actually from 2007. I had to convert my old posts from typeface to wordpress.

By: Brian Wisti

Brian Wisti — Fri, 24 Apr 2009 23:01:45 +0000

I’m curious why you used such dated versions of … well … everything. Is that just what you had available under FreeBSD 6?